Special Counsel: Casey's Candidacy Does Not Violate Hatch Act

Letter sent to Democratic Dist. 50 Candidate Stephen Casey dispels write-in opponent's claim of invalid candidacy.


Stephen Casey, Democratic candidate for Dist. 50, has not violated the Hatch Act, according to a ruling by the Office of Special Counsel in Washington, DC, dispelling Rep. Jon Brien's (D-Dist. 50) claim that his run was illegal.

Brien (D-Dist. 50) filed a Hatch Act complaint against Casey Sept. 27, claiming he violated the law as a candidate working for the Woonsocket Fire Department, which accepts federal funding for training.

The Hatch Act limits political activities of federal employees on and off duty. Casey's campaign, which won against Brien by a 52-vote majority, might have violated the Hatch Act if his job as a firefighter directly benefited from federal funding.

But on Tuesday, Leslie J. Gogan, an attorney with the Hatch Act Unit of the Office of Special Counsel in Washington, DC, issued a ruling putting Casey in the clear.

“Office of Special Counsel finds that you do not have duties in connection with federally funded programs and activities. As such, you do not fall within the Hatch Act’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Hatch Act does not prohibit you from being a candidate for public office in the partisan elections at issue” Gogan wrote.

Gogan said that since Casey hasn't applied for and doesn't administer any of the grants the Woonsocket Fire Department has received, he isn't in violation of the Hatch Act. She wrote that even though Casey has received overtime pay that was funded through a federal grant, he hasn't been paid from that grant since May 2012. Casey has been a candidate since June 27. 

"Additionally, as long as you refrain from participating in any of the department's federally funded overtime shifts, you will remain outside of the Act's jurisdiction," Gogan wrote. 

“From the beginning, I felt this was a claim without merit that was issued to distract Woonsocket voters from matters we should be addressing to help move the city forward. Since winning the primary election in September, I have continued walking door-to-door, and talking to constituents to find out their greatest concerns.  This has been and will continue to be my focus through Nov 6,” Casey wrote in a statement about the ruling.

"The only real abuse of taxpayer dollars was the wasted time and money spent on investigating this frivolous claim," Casey said in the release.

The ruling also removes the possibility of a special election taxpayers might have had to pay for if Brien's complaint was found to have merit.   




DR October 26, 2012 at 12:01 AM
Taxpayers lets take all these negative comments and turn them into positive by voting for Jon Brien on Tuesday 11/06/12. Also don't forget to support Bob Phillips and Lisa Baldelli-Hunt. Taxes and fees are too high in Woonsocket as it is now.
John Silva October 26, 2012 at 12:30 PM
Wake up people. If John Brian was any friend of the taxpayer he would have signed onto a bill in the general assembly last year that would have stopped tax cuts for anyone making over $250,000 a year. He would rather see the middle class struggle. He did just what ALEC wanted him to do. And that is to take care of the richest people. Goes to show you who he is beholden to. Not the taxpayers.
Dawn Mackenzie October 26, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Congratulations to Casey! It was a waste of money to investigate but now you are in the clear to take your elected office. Jon- You won't give up on the election but you did give up on an adequate funding formula which would have brought millions of dollars into the city's schools. If you had fought as hard for the school department, maybe we wouldn't be in such a mess. I can't afford to pay more taxes so I am not writing in your name.
Harold Ryan November 06, 2012 at 09:09 AM
I do believe JON BRIEN has worked for the taxpayers. As I understand it, he initiated and steadfastly held off the"Woonsocket supplemental tax" that we did not have to pay this year thanks to him and I will be voting for Mr.BRIEN, not for this one fact but for other issues I have brought before him.
Scott November 06, 2012 at 01:11 PM
Harold, you realize the budget commission is in place because he voted against the supplemental right? The budget commision with the 5 year plan that raises taxes by more than 30%. Suddenly the supplemental doesn't look so bad.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »