E.P. Reps Favor Same-Sex Marriage

East Providence's four state representatives voted in favor of the legislation that will allow same-gender marriages in RI; the final vote was 51-19

In an historic 51-19 vote, the Rhode Island House of Representatives approved a bill allowing same-sex marriage Thursday afternoon. The bill now goes to the state Senate, where leadership has said no action will be taken on it until spring.

East Providence Reps. Helio Melo, Gregg Amore, Katherine Kazarian and Joy Hearn all voted in favor of the bill, according to the official tally. The latter three representatives were among the 42 sponsors of the House bill.

“Obviously, this issue is about fairness and allowing all Rhode Islanders to have equal access to the rights and responsibilities that come with marriage, but marriage is about so much more than legal protections," said Rep. Art Handy  (D-Dist. 18, Cranston), the bill's primary sponsor. This was the 11th year Handy had introduced same sex marriage legislation.

"My wife and I have been married since 1997, and as we’ve worked together to raise our son, the value of having a committed, strong family has become more apparent to us over time. All Rhode Islanders deserve to enjoy that security and support, and deserve to have their family recognized as equal to others. It feels good to see how far we’ve come in Rhode Island toward valuing all families, and I know we are close to the day when marriage equality becomes law here."

Gov. Lincoln Chafee was also enthusiastic.

"There are certain legislative votes that can fairly be characterized as “historic.” The Rhode Island House of Representatives’ overwhelming passage of marriage equality legislation is one such vote," he said in a statement.

"I think most immediately of the pioneers of the House who have been working to achieve this goal for many years. Former state representatives such as Michael Pisaturo, who first introduced the Equal Access to Marriage Act in the mid-1990s, David Cicilline, who was the lone member of the House Judiciary Committee to vote in favor of marriage equality legislation in 2001, and Ray Sullivan. And current members such as Speaker Fox, Chairwoman Ajello, Deputy Majority Leader Ferri, and Chairman Handy, the bill’s longtime sponsor. I think also of activists such as the late Julie Pell, who certainly would have been encouraged to see this significant step forward."

Both Chafee and Handy noted that the bill faces challenges in the Senate. Senate President Theresa Paiva Weed opposes same sex marriage, as does Sen. Michael J. McCaffrey (D-Dist. 29, Warwick), chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where the bill goes next.

Chafee concluded, "Although this vote is indeed historic, there is still a long way to go. Now that the House has swiftly acted, I urge Senate leadership to 'call the roll' – for our economy, for our gay and lesbian friends and neighbors, and for history."

The bill reiterates the right of religious institutions to set their own guidelines for marriage eligibility within their faith.

Rhode Island is the only New England state that does not allow same-sex marriage. Currently nine states and Washington, D.C., allow same-sex couples to marry.

To see the complete vote, click here.

Jack January 25, 2013 at 02:17 PM
Great now are we going to do something about the economy, the RI tax structure.. you know things that affect 99% of the population.
Govstench January 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM
It boggles the mind what misplaced priorities these people have. It's the economy people!!
Dan Johnson March 24, 2013 at 05:06 PM
The Golden Rule is not just a promise of the founding documents, it is required by the constitution in both the 5th and 14th amendments as well as article 4. As procreation is not a legal requirement, no one has presented a legitimate governmental interest sufficient for denial of the fundamental right of marriage. "In the court’s final analysis, the government’s only basis for supporting DOMA comes down to an apparent belief that the moral views of the majority may properly be enacted as the law of the land in regard to state-sanctioned same-sex marriage in disregard of the personal status and living conditions of a significant segment of our pluralistic society. Such a view is not consistent with the evidence or the law as embodied in the Fifth Amendment with respect to the thoughts expressed in this decision. The court has no doubt about its conclusion: DOMA deprives them of the equal protection of the law to which they are entitled."


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »