patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Woonsocket Budget Commission Preparing For Union Talks

Sequino: Most of savings in budget likely to come from benefit negotiations, supplemental tax will also be necessary.

 

 

The Woonsocket Budget Commission met briefly this morning, discussing how to lay the groundwork for talks with the city's unions, where Chairman Bill Sequino says the bulk of the panel's cutting will take place.

Once those talks (which will likely begin next week) are finished, Sequino said, the Commission will also have to work to pass a supplemental tax bill. Both cuts and increased tax revenue will be required to solve the city's deficit, Sequino said. "It can't be one or the other," Sequino said.

The savings will have to focus primarily on benefits for the city's union employees, he said, since there is little to cut from the city's budget and the school budget, in the final review stage, is largely finished. 

On Thursday, Sequino said, the Budget Commission will meet to assess the situation, which will require gathering all the data on all city employees' benefits: holiday pay, vacation and, retirement and health care. Once they have all that information in one place, Sequino said, they can begin assessing what the city can fairly afford, and what they'll need to cut.

"I think we want to try to keep everybody the same if it's at all possible," Sequino said - equitable with each other, so no one group is getting more than another.

During Monday's meeting, Commission member City Council President John Ward suggested the meeting to figure out what they'd be asking from the unions. "I think the Commission needs to have a sense of the target," Ward said.

"I certainly agree," Sequino said, "The Budget Commission needs to get a game plan." 

They'll start putting that together at their next meeting Thursday, 3 p.m., at City Hall.

Related Topics: Budget Commission and Deficit

Not Leo Fontaine

1:13 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Here we go....the taxaholics want a supplemental again.This year's 4% and reduction in the homestead exemption wasn't enough.They're trying to be fair and equitable with the game rigged against the taxpayers!

Reply

la_mouffette

1:58 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Shared burden, attempted equity, an assessment of what the city can fairly afford,
and a game plan?

A game plan we'll see getting constructed, with DETAILS and TIMELINES?
0_0

This is all still very problematic because it doesn't address the causes of our various deficit-causing problems, "Not Leo" is right...
but it's at least a large step in a sane direction.

Based on this most recent meeting
three cheers for Bill Sequino.

The tragic thing is, this budget commission isn't doing anything our mayor and city council couldn't have done all by themselves...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Not Leo Fontaine

2:06 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Let's not forget the exponential growth in these numbers too.4% of 4000 is $160,4% of $2000 is $80.What a racket.

Steve

4:51 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

So the fire fighters, the police department and the city workers all have to bend over again to make up for the WED cost overruns? Isn't life good in the City on the Move!

How much have the teacher unions and WED taken it in the shorts over the last 5 years to balance the WED budget? (Oh wait, what is that, is that another step increase I see coming down the road) Gee, go figure huh...... LIfe is good.

Crickets, crickets, crickets..........

Reply
Comment_arrow

English first

5:59 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Did you see the great photos on their website? http://www.woonsocketschools.com/
Not all money goes to salaries.

Comment_arrow

Identity

6:32 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Over the past 5 years, the teachers/teachers union have done the following VOLUNTARILY: taken a 3.5 % pay cut, taken a 5 year pay freeze, increased their health care payments, and given back a deferred payment. The teachers are not the ones who have created this mess.

Comment_arrow

Memere

9:15 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Steve, ALL the auditors have said that the reason that the WED ran into deficit is because they have been underfunded for years ( both from the city and from the state I guess) From what I have read and heard at SC meetings, the teacher's union has given up quite a bit already.

Comment_arrow

Steve

9:57 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

So Identity, does that pay freeze include the step increases? And exactly what have you given in the form of health care payments. 10% co-pay rather than 0%?

When you look at the WED budget, and you see between 80 to 90% is labor costs, where do you think the adjustments should be made?

Comment_arrow

Steve

10:00 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Memere, like I've said in the past, underfunded by the city, the state, the feds? The only group that I see that is truly underfunded are the tax payers in the City of Woonsocket!

Rob

5:18 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Steve the teachers have given alot in concessions more than what city employees have.

Reply

David T

8:59 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

We know there are about 600 teachers. Does anyone know the numbers for fire, police and city hall as far as current workers?

Reply

Common Sense

9:14 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

Fire has about 120...police has about 85 (supposed to be 101) not sure about City Hall but I know they made huge cuts in numbers

Reply
Comment_arrow

English first

8:55 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Here is a website. http://www.localschooldirectory.com/district-schools/39/Woonsocket-School-District/RI I am not sure what year this is. I also do not know if the staff (psychologists, speech etc) is included.

DonQ

8:04 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The Mayor and City Council President's plan is definitely working. The only people who will be able to afford to live in this cesspool will be the welfare recipients who pay little to no taxes and the illegals who pay no taxes. Since these deadbeats/blood suckers already pay no taxes, they won't care how high the tax rates go.

Reply

Not Leo Fontaine

9:07 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

You can also thank the General Assembly for making bondholders off limits.Bondholders=speculators,taxpayers=savers (suckers).

Reply

Not Leo Fontaine

9:36 am on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

The term "bondholder" should be changed to "debtholder".Suck on your debt Woonsocket!

Reply

Get real people

12:35 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

For many many years the unions did not get pay increases and instead were given little benefit perks here and there in lieu of a pay increases. Now you want to take away all of that so basically they have nothing to show for years and years of hard earned work and dedication to the City of Woonsocket. I can assure you these workers are not racking in the money like many seem to assume. They are hard-working men and women who are trying to earn an honest living, oh yeah and they put their life on the line too - minor detail, and are struggling to support their families like everyone else in this City. Who in their right mind would want to work for the City and make the sacrifices they do? Certainly not me. We will get what we pay for, for sure. Not a risk I want to take the next time my family is in need and I have to dial 911.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

12:44 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

If these poor suffering union members aren't happy with their pay and benefits, let them move on. Unfortunately, most municipal union members don't have a clue what reality is in the private sector. I'm really fed up hearing about the poor union members who aren't being treated fairly. Ask all of the private sector workers who have lost their jobs because of the lousy economy in this city, state and country how they feel. I'm sure they are not going to shed a lot of tears for the unions folks who are still doing pretty darn good for themselves. Let me repeat myself if the unin workers in this city aren't happy - let them get out. Noone is forcing them to stay here.

Comment_arrow

Not Leo Fontaine

12:59 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Then it's all about the money,public sevice be damned.How's that for getting real?

Comment_arrow

DonQ

1:10 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Not Leo Fontaine,
Actually, it is all about common sense and proper management. You don't bankrupt the taxpayer's of the city so that you can keep feeding the union greed. In the real world, companies have to balance the bottom line. In other words, rather than keep raising the prices on their products until no one will buy them, they have to come up with ways to cut expenses - unfortunately the cuts usually translate to lay offs. In government, instead of finding appropriate ways to cut expenses (we can't insult the unions) our illustrious leaders just keep raising taxes. Let's do away with the step increases for teachers. Let's find ways to reduce spending in the public safety sector, let's find ways to reduce spending in the municipal departments - it isn't going to happen. Union greed dictates that the taxpayers are the ones that have to suffer. When the city was discussing ways to cut expenses in the School Department, Partington wasted no time in stating that instead of making cuts to the school department, the city should raise taxes. Typical union mentality.

Not Leo Fontaine

12:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

A friend of mine lost his job AND got a tax increase,if that happened to a union member you'd hear the whining clear across the state.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

1:01 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Unfortunately the union members seem to think they are sacred cows that no one should ever touch. One union member was complaining a few weeks ago that he has to work more overtime to try and make up some of the money he is loosing. I guess they don't realize that in the real world, when a company is trying to cut expenses, one of the first things to be eliminated is overtime. In Woonsocket,due to really poor management, we manufacture overtime for the union workers. God forbid that we should really attempt to cut expenses and lessen the burden on the taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

Memere

4:54 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

It has happened to MANY Union members. Many have lost their jobs and are now paying much higher taxes. Moral of the story, DO NOT encourage your son or daughter to work for Woonsocket. This city continues to demand more and more from its employees and still continues to raise their taxes. How is that fair to employees who have dedicated their lives to work for this city. And when the going gets tough because of mismanagement at City Hall, the taxpayers blame the employees, who had absolutely NOTHING to do with the decisions that got us in this mess. To be fair, let's put the blame where it should really be, on the steps of City Hall. Has our Mayor taken a cut in pay???? Mayors in other communities across the country have when they asked their employees to take a cut in pay. You lead by example. It may be an old fashioned concept, but it's the only fair way.

Get real people

1:24 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

I think it would be a great idea if some of you guys spent a day in a life of a UNION WORKER. Particularly fighting a fire in 95 degree weather. That sounds like a great place to start.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

1:32 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Yes, when they work, they work hard no one will deny that. Please don't insult our intelligence by making it sound like they spend the majority of their time fighting fires in 95 degree weather. I have seen how hard they work the majority of the time.

DonQ

1:36 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Let's also keep in mind that the a large percentage of the union members - be it municipal, public safety or education - do not live in the city. They really don't care how much the taxpayers have to shell out to support them. I doubt that they have much sympathy for their union brothers and sisters who do live in the city and have to share in the increased tax burden,

Reply
Comment_arrow

harley0011

10:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Excuse me Don Q but as a union member I can safely say, 75% of my coworkers do live in the city and have been absorbing a lot with taxes as well as our concessions, so please get facts before you post.

Comment_arrow

harley0011

11:12 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

And as far as how hard the union members are working......it takes training in crazy weather to be able to function the way we do, so don't insinuate that people are sitting around unless a call comes in, because that is clearly not the case if you take time to educate yourself to what the fire dept or police dept do while they are dealing with people you would not even acknowledge as a life form in your every day life. Educate yourself before you speak. I am very happy you haven't needed emergency services, but the day you do is the day you get a glimpse into what each public safety person actually does. Until that day you will not understand and until that day you are not fit to speak on the topic. Thank you Memere, I am glad someone sees things for what they really are.

Comment_arrow

John Ward Jr.

7:50 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Just do the job you're paid to do and stop cheerleading for more taxes.End of conversation.

Comment_arrow

harley0011

9:14 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Oh Mr Ward I'm not cheerleading, I giving facts. If people want to get on a blog and insult us I am well within my rights to defend what we do. No argument at all. I know what I'm talking about and you sit on the outside claiming to know what you're talking about. And I will "end the conversation when I please......now the conversation is over........ Have a nice day!

Common Sense

1:48 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Don Q., the unions will be forced to take serious cuts. That is not in doubt. In the meantime enjoy your yearly 4% tax increase and the loss of your precious homestead exemption. My taxes went up every year while you ate Menards chicken dinner and drank her look aid with no increase for 13 yrs. You can cry all you want...Pay the piper and send Sue a thank you card.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

2:44 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Sorry to disappoint you lack of common sense. Never accepted a chicken dinner from Menard nor did I drink the kool aid. Unfortunately I am one of the few remaining taxpayers left in this city who is forced to struggle to pay for union excesses and those who are living the good life by having the taxpayers support them. When you don't have to share in the burden, then it is easy to have absolutely no concern for the taxpayers. There are those who post on here frequently who don't share in the burden but constantly runs his mouth about how easy the taxpayer's have had it.

Comment_arrow

Memere

4:58 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Sorry, but you are dead wrong. It is not the Union members who ate Mayor Menard's chicken dinners. Those were offered at the high rises.

Rob

2:26 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Couldn't have said it better myself, thank you common sense for bringing common sense to some people here

Reply

Common Sense

3:11 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Don Q., you just don't get it...this "burden" you speak of is what my family has faced EVERY year while you enjoyed the Menard no tax increase. Here are your options. 1: pay up and shut up 2: sell your lovely Woonsocket home (good luck) or 3: let the bank take it...hahaha

Reply
Comment_arrow

Memere

5:05 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Common sense, I am sorry that you have suffered but, you are definitely not the only one. Many city employees, who you continue to to blame, do not make a high salary and are now having to pay the same high taxes that you do. If you are fortunate enough to not be a homeowner in this city, than you have the option of moving to another city if you do not like the atmosphere here. I take great offense with your comment "Put up and shut up". EVERY tax payer in this city, especially the homeowners who are paying for most of this mess, has the right to voice his opinion!!!!

Still Hope

3:32 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Common Sense, what are you squawkin about? Menard kept the tax burden and fees off the single family property owner. She instead relied on State aid, commercial revenue, and multi-family tax income to pay for the $100M+ city budgets.

Now, with the loss of that State funding and reduced commercial revenue, the city is on the prowl to sap the single family property owner once again. Makes you wonder, if Menard were still around, wouldn't she be seeking other ways to get us out this crisis, rather than draining our heart and soul?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

3:51 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Still Hope,
People like Common Sense and robert_lamarre jr overlook the fact that although the tax rate may not have increased as much as they would have liked to seen, never the less the single family home owner has seen a significant increase in their tax burden. Common Sense is sadly mistaken if he thinks my actual tax bill(s) didn't increase during the time Menard was Mayor. Of course I guess he thinks that the significant pay and benefit increases the unions received under Menard just appeared out of thin air.

Rob

3:49 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

no she would have taken from the school department and then the single family homeowner

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

3:57 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

lamarre jr.,
Come out of your fantasy world and join reality. Those of us who do pay taxes have seen increases every year in our tax bills. I have owned a house in Woonsocket for 28 years and there has not been one single year when the amount of taxes that I pay Has not gone up - that includes the years that Menard was Mayor. I can accept the fact that you don't pay taxes, but I'm fed up with your ridiculous attitude against those who do support this city.

Comment_arrow

Rob

9:41 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Yeah but you single family homeowners hav had a 42% hmoestead exemption so that high tax rate doesn't seem so high

Comment_arrow

DonQ

9:57 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

robert lamarre jr,
Other than your contempt and jealousy of single family home owners, what have you contributed to the City of Woonsocket. How many kids do you have in the Woonsocket School system that those of us who do pay taxes have to pay to educate? Hopefully, when they do graduate, they will stick around and become productive tax paying citizens. However, I wont hold my breath waiting for it to happen.

Carol Hannah

4:04 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Here's my question.. Why are we asking the unions (teachers, municpal, fire & police) to continue to take cuts when the administration doesn't? The Public Works director makes over $100,000 annually plus benefits, and has use of a city vehicle that she drives back and forth to South County; the Mayor makes $80,000 and has not taken a pay cut; the Economic Development director makes $80,000 annually yet what commerical and industrial revenue streams has he introduced? His 'assistant' receives, not only her pay, but at least one stipend as well yet she only functions as a 'jump station' - directing people to other agencies. Why haven't they taken cuts? And why aren't the unions pushing for them to take cuts? If I was making $32,000, hadn't had a cost of living increase in more than 4 years, and was continually pressed to increase my workload and decrease my compensation, al whil ebeing told that 'we are all in this together' - I would expect my superiors to lead by example. I simply cannot understand why they are untouchable

Reply
Comment_arrow

DonQ

4:18 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Carol,
I think very few people will disagree with you. Leading by example should begin at the top - i.e. the Mayor. This just demonstrates once again his total lack of ability to properly run the City. What has our City Council done to push for pay cuts at the non union managerial level - answer again - absolutely nothing. We have a Mayor and City Council who are not capable of thinking outside the box. There have been some very smart people (non elected) in this city who have presented the City Council with ideas on cutting costs. Those ideas have been shot down by the Mayor and City Council President. John Ward is like a broken record - no matter what is suggested to him, his stock answer is "There's nothing we can do". If we get rid of Fontaine and Ward (and others) we may have a remote chance of saving this city. As long as they are running the city, the only ideas they will come up with will be to raise taxes.

Comment_arrow

Rob

9:53 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Hey don how many city council meetings have you gone to, how many school committe meetings have you gone to, how many budget commission meetings have you gone to, I only have a problem with you and nobody else because your always targeting me so how does it feel. LIKE I SAID DON'T LIKE IT DON'T READ IT DONQ (put your glasses on)

Common Sense

4:15 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

No hope and Don, I will say again. My family bore that burden you so soundly speak of EVERY year. My water, sewer taxes increased every year right along with my property. You kept electing her because she didn't raise the property tax and she did that with state and federal funding and by NOT giving sweetheart deal contracts to the unions. So congratulations now open your checkbooks

Reply
Comment_arrow

Still Hope

8:19 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Again, what are you talkin about? First off, water and sewer is NOT a tax any more than your electricity is a tax. Stop using and you'll stop paying. Second, I would like to know where you live and why you are being treated different than everyone else? You keep reiterating that "your family bore some increasing burden EVERY year". I'm gonna take a stab and say you live in a 3-family with some relatives on each floor. Otherwise, your tax liability should have seen waning and waxing with the changing budgets and the modified homestead exemptions, just like the rest of us. Please enlighten us on the injustices you've faced.

As far as keeping Menard in office, I think had a lot to do with the direction she was taking the city. She was concerned about bringing back the culture, restoring rundown buildings and neglected tenament houses, revitalizing the community, and reestablishing a strong business presence. She tried to achieve this while being fiscally responsible. She was tough, but fair with unions. She offered a city where you could proudly raise a family. Remember when Autumnfest wasn't just a hangout for drunks and punks? Unfortunately, the guy who led the charge to oust the former mayor is now running the city into a hole filled with debt, frustration, and a big F U to the families and businesses that Sue Menard tried to attract.

Leo is letting the businesses go while stickin it to the families. I wonder what his motives really are.

taxed2death

4:19 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

get rid of the
ed director and shift it to the mayor as in the past this was done = $80000.00 savings

Reply
Comment_arrow

English first

10:05 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Can you mention when this was done. I can't imagine the mayor was Ed director. Maybe the public safety director....

Carol Hannah

4:25 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Or keep him, but lower the salary to $40,000 plus commission - some percentage of whatever commercial tax revenue he would bring into the city.

Reply

John Ward Jr.

4:52 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Anybody out there feel like they're being protected to death?

Reply
Comment_arrow

harley0011

10:45 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

You are pathetic Mr. Ward..... Perhaps if you spent a little time with the police and fire depts you would have a clue what it is they actually do...... Don't speak if you don't know what you're actually talking about. You sound like an idiot when you open your mouth to the people that are actually working with the non tax paying residents you would never give the time of day to.....

Comment_arrow

John Ward Jr.

7:07 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I guess you feel it's okay to drop tax increases on the unemployed and underemployed,you're the pathetic one,shaking down people that are hurting so you can live high on the hog.Don't come back with the tired argument that everyone can be cops and firefighters either,there aren't enough positions available.Who's pathetic now?Your peers in the past didn't shake people down,didn't retire after 20 years and didn't whine as much as you do.Ok,you can start with the insults now!

Comment_arrow

harley0011

9:23 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

No insults Mr. Ward, you're entitled to your opinion, however stop the grandstanding for political aspirations and be honest, unions are not to blame for the issues in this city. This city has just under 42,000 residents and 11,000 tax payers, THAT is the source of the problem. I'm simply saying be a realist. These numbers are why this city in the fiscal condition it's in, but as usual you have to blame unions. Have you thought about moving to Wisconsin......it really is lovely this time of year.

Comment_arrow

DonQ

9:36 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

harley0011,
As long as you feel you need to respond to messages, you might want to use a little common sense. I'm fairly certain (though not positive) that the John Ward Jr. who you are trading barbs with IS NOT City Council President John Ward. Trust me, I think John Ward is the lowest form of dirt this city has ever seen. The only person worse than Ward is Fontaine ( although it is a close race). Whether I agree with you or not (which I don't) I can't see you making yourself look foolish by thinking you are fencing with Ward the councilor.

The Chorus

4:53 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Common Sense - you keep laying this at the feet of Susan and she is culpable but let us not forget that the Mayor proposes the budget but it's the city council that is ultimately responsible for passing the final budget. As such, Leo and Ward and the rest of the council are just as culpable.

Reply

Common Sense

9:51 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

No hope, have you checked Woonsocket's commercial tax rate? It is and has been for many years, one of the highest in the State. Menard business friendly? You're too funny. She knew the businesses didn't command the voting block she needed to get reelected and pad her fat pension. She's laughing all the way to the bank. Suckers.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Still Hope

12:26 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

The commercial tax rate in Woonsocket is on par with the rate of most urban communities in RI. If that is your only gauge for business climate, then you are neglecting quite a few important incentives and programs. Do you think CVS stays here because they enjoy the smell? Feel free to research the many financially friendly programs Woonsocket offers to certain businesses, also note which ones were enacted or supported during Menard's tenure. And finally, note the Main St project, the Market Sq revitalization, the Arts revival, the push for the updated rail system(both intrastate and high speed Amtrak), the mill incentives, etc etc. Many projects that were headed by the former mayor, yet is now scrapped or placed on the back burner.

Let me be clear: I do not like Sue Menard. But she had better control on this city than the monkeys in office today. Fact is, she got the job done…even if she had to grease a few palms to do it. Leo and his misfits are working off of hopes and dreams.

harley0011

11:19 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Wow.....I commented twice tonight, the one addressed to Mr Ward needs to be approved but the others don't.....way to try and slant view points Mr. Ward.....if its not supporting your view point act like it doesn't exist....that sounds about right.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Ward Jr.

7:10 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Actually,i don't hang on your every comment,i do have a life and my life doesn't revolve around your biased views.Go join the Mafia shakedown man.

Common Sense

12:55 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I called Woonsocket home for 27yrs. I saw the direction the City was heading with the many social service agencies attracting people who are too lazy to work. I decided that my families quality of life was important to me and my hard earned money was better spent elsewhere. You have no one to blame but yourself for your lack of foresight and/or poor decision making when choosing your career path.

Reply

taxed2death

4:50 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

gee leaves you to wonder. all these complaining tax payers would and should take that supplement for life tax bill and write on the envelope RETURN TO SENDER but won't happened. do like I did I assumed X amount of dolar for my supp. tax bill than I called a mover. bye bye taxpayers

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Ward Jr.

7:35 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I'm lovin' it taxed2death,good for you! I'm stuck here for the time being but i plan to leave,hopefully some welfare type takes my place and sucks of Woonsocket's you know what some more.I'll take my money somewhere else,they can all fight over the scraps that's left.

Marc Beauregard

5:49 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Make no mistake people. The supplemental tax is coming one way or another. The grandstanding that Lisa Hunt did was pathetic. Everyone should be able to see right through that. Poor Lisa cried saying she can't support it because the taxpayers can't afford another dollar. Yet on the last day/ morning of session she was negotiating with the Speaker and Governors office to lower it to 9 %. What happened to the taxpayers can't afford it? She's just like Uncle Charlie which is a Republican and a flip flopper. She used her position for her own gain. Wake up people.

Reply

John

7:56 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Marc, I agree with you 100%. Lisa Baldelli-Hunt will do anything she can to destroy the reputation of the people currently in office because she wants to be Mayor. Uncle Charlie will do anything he can to help her just because he is an attention seeking leach that needs to stay relevant to feed his over-sized ego.
In a time like this Hunt should put her personal aspirations aside and work with the administration to try and fix things for the good of the people that elected her not use this as an opportunity to grandstand and advance her career!

Reply

Rob

9:47 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Thats not true and she sopke about that on wpri.com why don't listen before you speak

Reply

English first

10:19 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Getting back to the subject. i think all "state" teacher retirements have been "frozen". This means if a teacher, who was required to put into the pension fund, who retires at 60 years of age will get a COLA raise in 15-19 years. Is that a concession? I don't think so because it was mandatory. However, so was putting into the pension system mandatory. I think. Any of you know the actual facts about this?

Reply

John

11:09 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

One more thing. Now that Baldelli-Hunt cried and failed to support the supplemental tax bill, instead of having a one time supplemental bill and slightly higher tax rate going forward we are now losing our 42% Homestead exemption forever!! Thank you Lisa!! I can't wait to see what you'll do as Mayor.

Reply

John

11:12 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Robert, If you keep defending Baldelli-Hunt isn't Dr. Donoyann going to get jealous??

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rob

10:13 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012

Why are you? or is your buddy don q in your ear

Jerry

10:00 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012

Maybe Lisa can have a "satelite" office at "social ocean" and have a parks program for all the bums that ruin it.

Reply

dennis bruneault

11:12 pm on Friday, August 3, 2012

I would just like to ask a simple question. Would our whole country be in better financial shape if every American were invested in social securety and medicare instead of all these different pension and health care plans that i read about?

Reply

Leave a comment